Optimisation, polarisation, peripheralisation: alternative development paths of the regions of the East and North Finland in the frame of spatial justice

Abstract

The green economy, growth and transition stand out from the policy narratives of sustainable development. Policy programmes, agendas and strategies aim to direct development into the post-fossil and post-plastic society. In addition, the transition should be fair and just for different people, communities, and places. These agendas are promising for regions such as East and North Finland, whose development relies largely on the sustainable use of natural resources. The article examines: 1) what kind of alternative regional development paths are framed by the green transition scenario narratives of development actors, 2) how different functions are located, and 3) how spatial justice is described? The data is based on the interviews with representatives of regional councils and sub-regional or municipal development organisations. The desired development path describes regional optimisation where benefits are maximized and diffused throughout the region. The plausible path describes regional polarisation with fragmented regional benefits. The undesirable development path describes regional peripheralisation, in which case the benefits are mainly directed outside the region or to regional centres.