Monitavoitteisuuden sumentavuus ja agonismin vaikeus: Metsädiskurssihankkeen löydöksiä ja uusia tutkimussuuntia

Tuomo Takala

doi:10.30663/ay.120749

Authors

Tuomo Takala University of Eastern Finland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30663/ay.120749

Keywords:

critical discourse analysis, forest owner, media, sustainability change

Abstract

Forest discourses and their power relations determine what can be said in the Finnish forest policy discussion. This review presents the main findings of a forest discourse research project and introduces new research paths based on these findings. The project concentrated on the forest discourses of forest owners and media.

The results illustrate how the landscape of Finnish forest discourses is characterised by a clear main dimension from wood production discourses criticizing nature conservation to environmental discourses criticizing forestry. In the intermediate positions between these extremes, but still close to the wood production discourses, one can find hegemonic discourses of multi-objective forestry. When determining what is right and wrong in forest policy discussion, this basic setting has a fundamental impact on what it is like to be a forest owner in Finland or whether a sustainability change can take place.

The world is full of research topics for those interested in the manifestation and power of forest discourses. Combining post-political theories with theories of discourses opens new interesting possibilities for analysing the state of forest policy in different formal and non-formal policy forums. Outside discourse analysis, we should study the development, expressions and effects of environmental concern at the level of individuals, as concern for nature and the environment seems to be an absolute prerequisite for a sustainability change.

References

Anshelm, J. & Haikola, S. (2018) Depoliticization, repoliticization, and environmental concerns – Swedish mining politics as an instance of environmental politicization. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 17(2) 561–596.

Arts, B., Appelstrand, M., Kleinschmit, D., Pülzl, H. & Visseren-Hamakers, I. (2010) Discourses, actors and instruments in international forest governance. Teoksessa Rayner, P., Buck, J. & Katila, A. (toim.) Embracing complexity: Meeting the international forest governance challenge 57–74. International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO), Tampere.

Arvai, J.L. & Mascarenhas, M.J. (2001) Print media framing of the environmental movement in a Canadian forestry debate. Environmental Management 27 705–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002670010181

Cunsolo, A. & Ellis, N.R. (2018) Ecological grief as a mental health response to climate change-related loss. Nature Climate Change 8 275–281. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0092-2

Dobson, A. (2003) Citizenship and the Environment. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199258449.001.0001

Fairclough, N. (2010) Critical discourse analysis. The Critical Study of Language. Pearson Education Limited, Harlow.

Fairclough, N., Jessop, B. & Sayer, A. (2010) Critical realism and semiosis. Teoksessa Fairclough, N. (toim.) Critical Discourse Analysis. The Critical Study of Language 202–222. Pearson Education Limited, Harlow.

Giddings, B., Hopwood, B. & O’Brien, G. (2002) Environment, economy and society: Fitting them together into sustainable development. Sustainable Development 10 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.199

Halonen, M., Näyhä, A. & Kuhmonen, I. (2022) Regional sustainability transition through forest-based bioeconomy? Development actors' perspectives on related policies, power, and justice. Forest Policy and Economics 142 102775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102775

Hoogstra-Klein, M.A., Brukas, V. & Wallin, I. (2017) Multiple-use forestry as a boundary object: From a shared ideal to multiple realities. Land Use Policy 69 247–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.029

Huttunen, S., Salo, M., Aro, R. & Turunen, A. (2020) Environmental citizenship in geography and beyond. Fennia 198(1-2) 196–209. https://doi.org/10.11143/fennia.90715

Kröger, M. & Raitio, K. (2017) Finnish forest policy in the era of bioeconomy: a pathway to sustainability? Forest Policy and Economics 77 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.12.003

Lehtinen, A. A. (2022) Politicisation of Nature in Nordic Geography. Teoksessa Jakobsen, P., Jönsson, E. & Larsen, H.G. (toim.) Socio-Spatial Theory in Nordic Geography 87–104. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04234-8_6

Lindahl, K.B., Sténs, A., Sandström, C., Johansson, J., Lidskog, R., Ranius, T. & Roberge, J.-M. (2017) The Swedish forestry model: more of everything? Forest Policy and Economics 77 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.10.012

Leipold, S. (2014) Creating forests with words – a review of forest-related discourse studies. Forest Policy and Economics 40 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2013.12.005

Leipold, S., Feindt, P.H., Winkel, G. & Keller, R. (2019) Discourse analysis of environmental policy revisited: traditions, trends, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 21 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1660462

Mattila, H. (2018) The “Aesthetic Turn” as a bridge between communicative and agonist planning theories. Architectural Research in Finland 2 94–113.

McBride, B.B., Brewer, C.A., Berkowitz, A.R. & Borrie W. T. (2013) Environmental literacy, ecological literacy, ecoliteracy: What do we mean and how did we get here? Ecosphere 4(5) 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES13-00075.1

McCune, B. & Grace, J.B. (2002) Analysis of Ecological Communities. MjM Software, Gleneden beach.

Melo-Escrihuela, C. (2008) Promoting ecological citizenship: Rights, duties and political agency. ACME: An International E-journal for Critical Geographies 7(2) 113–134.

Mouffe, C. (2002) The Democratic Paradox. Verso, London.

Sawatzky, M. (2013) Voices in the Woods: A Study of Forest-Use in Eastern Manitoba. Publications of the University of Eastern Finland no. 55, Joensuu.

Takala, T., Hujala, T., Tanskanen, M. & Tikkanen, J. (2017a) Forest owners’ discourses of forests: Ideological origins of ownership objectives. Journal of Rural Studies 51 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.01.014

Takala, T., Hujala, T., Tanskanen, M. & Tikkanen, J. (2017b) The order of forest owners’ discourses: Hegemonic and marginalised truths about the forest and forest ownership. Journal of Rural Studies 55 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.07.009

Takala, T., Hujala, T., Tanskanen, M. & Tikkanen, J. (2019a) Discoursal preconditions for biodiversity conservation in private forests. Biodiversity and Conservation 28 3445–3464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01831-7

Takala, T., Lehtinen, A., Hujala, T., Tanskanen, M. & Tikkanen, J. (2019b) The rise of multi-objective forestry paradigm in the Finnish print media. Forest Policy and Economics 106 101973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101973

Takala, T., Lehtinen, A., Tanskanen, M., Hujala, T. & Tikkanen, J. (2020) Discoursal power and multi-objective forestry in the Finnish print media. Forest Policy and Economics 111 102031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102031

Takala, T., Lehtinen, A., Hujala, T., Tanskanen, M., Brockhaus, M., Tikkanen, J. & Toppinen, A. (2021) Forest owners as political actors. Environmental Science and Policy 126 22–30.

Takala, T., Brockhaus, M., Hujala, T., Tanskanen, M., Lehtinen, A., Tikkanen, J. & Toppinen, A. (2022) Discursive barriers to voluntary biodiversity conservation: The case of Finnish forest owners. Forest Policy and Economics 136 102681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102681

Wilson, J. & Swyngedouw, E. (2014) Seeds of dystopia: Post-politics and the return of the political. Teoksessa Wilson, J. & Swyngedouw, E. (toim.) The Post-Political and Its Discontents, Spaces of Depoliticisation, Spectres of Radical Politics 1–22. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.