Discursive Justifications of Dog’s Vegetarian Diet. An Intro to Multispecies Lifestyle Politics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30663/ay.142238Keywords:
vegetarian dog food, veganism, carnism, multispecies lifestyle politicsAbstract
Social sciences have shed light on various aspects of vegetarianism and veganism but overlooked the feeding of non-human animals. I use discourse analysis and interview data to investigate how vegan dog guardians challenge carnism and justify their vegetarian feeding practices discursively. The feeding practices and discourses are understood as multispecies lifestyle politics of veganism. The analysis answers the following research questions: what kind of discourses make dogs vegetarian and how are the nature and naturalness of the dog defined in these discourses? The three identified discourses construct dogs as thoroughly social beings in human responsibility, making dog food an area of human choice, where ethical and new microscopical nutritional thinking should replace naturalizing carnist discourses. In the vegan lifestyle movement, dog is a silent but species-typically treated member who has no choice but to participate, because dogs are always part of their guardians’ lifestyles, whether or not the guardian is aware of the political dimensions of dog-related consumption. The study introduces the concept of multispecies lifestyle politics and reveals how dog and dog food consumption are worked discursively when incorporated into a politicized lifestyle.
References
Aaltola, E. (2004) Eläinten moraalinen arvo. Vastapaino, Tampere.
Abbate, C.E. (2020) Valuing Animals as They Are—Whether They Feel It or Not. European Journal of Philosophy 28(3) 770–788. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12521
Arppe, T., Mäkelä, J. & Väänänen, V. (2011) Living Food Diet and Veganism: Individual vs Collective Boundaries of the Forbidden. Social Science Information 50(2) 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018410396618
Baker, C. (2023) Humane Dog Food? Caring and Killing in the Certified Humane Dog Food Value Chain. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, ennakkojulkaisu, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486231165457
Beardsworth, A. & Keil, T. (1997) Sociology on the Menu: An Invitation to the Study of Food and Society. Routledge, Lontoo.
Bertuzzi, N. (2020) The individualization of political activism: A reflection on social movements and modernization, starting from the case of Italian animal advocacy. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 40 (3/4) 282–303. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-09-2019-0180
Chao, S. (2021) The Beetle or the Bug? Multispecies Politics in a West Papuan Oil Palm Plantation. American Anthropologist 123(3) 476–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13592
Charles, N. (2014) ‘Animals Just Love You as You Are’: Experiencing Kinship across the Species Barrier. Sociology 48(4) 715–730. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038513515353
Cherry, E. (2006) Veganism as a Cultural Movement: A Relational Approach. Social Movement Studies 5(2) 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742830600807543
Cochrane, A. & Cojocaru, M.-D. (2023) Veganism as political solidarity: Beyond ‘ethical veganism’. Journal of Social Philosophy 54(1) 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12460
Cudworth, E. (2016) On Ambivalence and Resistance: Carnism and Diet in Multi-Species Households. Teoksessa Potts, A. (toim.) Meat Culture 222–242. Brill, Leiden. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004325852_013
Cudworth, E. (2021) Muddied Living: Making Home with Dog Companions. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 41(3/4) 424–439. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-08-2019-0165
Dant, T. (1991) Knowledge, Ideology, and Discourse: A Sociological Perspective. Routledge, Lontoo.
Dodd, S. A. S., Cave, N. J., Adolphe, J. L., Shoveller, A. K. & Verbrugghe, A. (2019) Plant-Based (Vegan) Diets for Pets: A Survey of Pet Owner Attitudes and Feeding Practices. PLOS ONE 14(1) e0210806. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210806
Domínguez-Oliva, A., Mota-Rojas, D., Semendric, I. & Whittaker, A. L. (2023) The Impact of Vegan Diets on Indicators of Health in Dogs and Cats: A Systematic Review. Veterinary Sciences 10(1) 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10010052
Fox, R. (2006) Animal Behaviours, Post-Human Lives: Everyday Negotiations of the Animal–Human Divide in Pet-Keeping. Social & Cultural Geography 7(4) 525–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360600825679
Garfinkel, H. (1984) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Polity press, Cambridge
Gheihman, N. (2021) Veganism as a Lifestyle Movement. Sociology Compass 15(5) e12877. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12877
Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Polity Press, Cambridge.
Giddens, A. (1995) Elämää jälkitraditionaalisessa yhteiskunnassa. Teoksessa Beck, U., Giddens, A. & Lash, S. (toim.) Nykyajan jäljillä. Refleksiivinen modernisaatio 83–152. Käännös Lehto, L. Vastapaino, Tampere.
Greenebaum, J. B. (2012) Managing Impressions: “Face-Saving” Strategies of Vegetarians and Vegans. Humanity & Society 36(4) 309–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160597612458898
Haenfler, R., Johnson, B. & Jones, E. (2012) Lifestyle Movements: Exploring the Intersection of Lifestyle and Social Movements. Social Movement Studies 11(1) 1–20 https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2012.640535
Haraway, D. (2003) The Companion Species Manifesto. Prickly Paradigm Press, Chicago.
Heiskala, R. (1996) Kohti keinotekoista yhteiskuntaa. Gaudeamus, Helsinki.
Helsingin Sanomat (2016) Eläinlääkäri: Koira voi olla vegaani, jos ruokavalio koostetaan oikein – mutta koira itse valitsisi kyllä lihan. <https://www.hs.fi/elama/art-2000002926479.html>. 2.8.2023.
Helsingin Uutiset (2017) Koiran vegaaniruokavalio jakaa asiantuntijoita – ’Rotujen kesken on merkittäviä eroja’. 18.6.2017. <https://www.helsinginuutiset.fi/paikalliset/1444086>. 9.6.2023.
Hens, K. (2009) Ethical Responsibilities Towards Dogs: An Inquiry into the Dog–Human Relationship. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22(1) 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-008-9120-y
Herzog, H. A. (1991) Conflict of Interests: Kittens and Boa Constrictors, Pets and Research. American Psychologist 46(3) 246–248. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.46.3.246
Hirschman, E. C. (1994) Consumers and Their Animal Companions. Journal of Consumer Research 20(4) 616–632. https://doi.org/10.1086/209374
Irvine, L. (2004) If You Tame Me: Understanding Our Connection With Animals. Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
Irvine, L. & Cilia, L. (2017) More-than-human Families: Pets, People, and Practices in Multispecies Households. Sociology Compass 11(2) e12455. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12455
Jallinoja, P., Niva, M. & Vinnari, M. (2018) Veganism and Plant-Based Eating: Analysis of Interplay Between Discursive Strategies and Lifestyle Political Consumerism. Teoksessa Boström, M., Micheletti, M. & Oosterveer, P. (toim.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Consumerism 157–180 Oxford University Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190629038.013.52
Janssen, M., Busch, C., Rödiger, M. & Hamm, U. (2016) Motives of Consumers Following a Vegan Diet and Their Attitudes towards Animal Agriculture. Appetite 105 643–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.06.039
Jokinen, A. & Juhila, K. (2016) Valtasuhteiden analysoiminen. Teoksessa Jokinen, A., Juhila, K., & Suoninen, E. (toim.) Diskurssianalyysi. Teoriat, peruskäsitteet ja käyttö 63–84. Vastapaino, Tampere.
Jokinen, A., Juhila, K. & Suoninen, E. (2012) Kategoriat, kulttuuri & moraali: johdatus kategoria-analyysiin. Vastapaino, Tampere.
Jokinen, A., Juhila, K., & Suoninen, E. (2016) Diskursiivinen maailma. Teoreettiset lähtökohdat ja analyyttiset käsitteet. Teoksessa Jokinen, A., Juhila, K., & Suoninen, E. (toim.) Diskurssianalyysi. Teoriat, peruskäsitteet ja käyttö 21–42. Vastapaino, Tampere.
Joy, M. (2010) Why we love dogs, eat pigs and wear cows: An introduction to carnism. Conari Press, San Francisco.
Knight, A. & Leitsberger, M. (2016) Vegetarian versus Meat-Based Diets for Companion Animals. Animals 6(9) 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani6090057
Knight, A. & Satchell, L. (2021) Vegan versus Meat-Based Pet Foods: Owner-Reported Palatability Behaviours and Implications for Canine and Feline Welfare. PLOS ONE 16(6) e0253292. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253292
Koski, L. & Bäcklund, P. (2012) Koiran virka: Susi kaupunkien kaduilla vai ystävä erämaassa? Alue ja Ympäristö 41(2) 22–33. <https://aluejaymparisto.journal.fi/article/view/64748>
Kylkilahti, E., Syrjälä, H., Autio, J., Kuismin, A. & Autio, M. (2016) Understanding Co-Consumption between Consumers and Their Pets. International Journal of Consumer Studies 40(1) 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12230
Laki eläinten hyvinvoinnista 693/2023. <https://finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/2023/20230693>. 15.11.2023.
Li, P. & Wu, G. (2023) Amino Acid Nutrition and Metabolism in Domestic Cats and Dogs. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 14(1) 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-022-00827-8
Lundahl, O. (2017) From a Moral Consumption Ethos to an Apolitical Consumption Trend: The Role of Media and Celebrities in Structuring the Rise of Veganism. Acta Wasaensia 381. Faculty of Business Studies. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-476-761-3
Malamud, R. (2007) Introduction: Famous Animals in Modern Culture Teoksessa Malamud, R. (toim.) A Cultural History of Animals in the Modern Age 1–26. Berg, Oxford.
Manninen, E. (2021) Koirien vegaaninen ruokinta jakaa ammattilaisten näkemyksiä. Koiramme 6/2021 30–41. Suomen Kennelliitto.
Martens, P., Su, B. & Deblomme, S. (2019) The Ecological Paw Print of Companion Dogs and Cats. BioScience 69(6) 467–474. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz044
Massa, I., Lillunen A., & Karisto, A. (2006) Ruokaan liittyvät uudet merkitykset. Teoksessa Mononen, T. & Silvasti, T. (toim.) Ruokakysymys. Näkökulmia yhteiskuntatieteelliseen elintarviketutkimukseen 156–182. Gaudeamus, Helsinki.
McEachern, M. G. & Cheetham, F. (2013) A Conception of Moral Sensitivity and Everyday Consumption Practices: Insights from the Moralizing Discourses of Pet Owners: Moral Sensitivity and Everyday Consumption Practices. International Journal of Consumer Studies 37(3) 337–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12005
Milburn, J. (2015) Not Only Humans Eat Meat: Companions, Sentience, and Vegan Politics. Journal of Social Philosophy 46(4) 449–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12131
Milburn, J. (2017) The Animal Lovers’ Paradox? On the Ethics of Pet Food. Teoksessa Overall, C. (toim.) Pets and People: The Ethics of Our Relationships with Companion Animals 187–202. Oxford University Press, New York.
Milburn, J. (2022) Just Fodder: The Ethics of Feeding Animals. McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal.
Narayanan, Y. & Srinivasan, K. (2023) Theme Issue Introduction: The Species Turn in Indian Identity Politics. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 6(2) 703–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486231167867
Okin, G. S. (2017) Environmental Impacts of Food Consumption by Dogs and Cats. PLOS ONE 12(8) e0181301. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181301
Oven, A., Yoxon, B. & Milburn J. (2022) Investigating the Market for Cultivated Meat as Pet Food: A Survey Analysis. PLOS ONE 17(12) e0275009. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275009
Pecoraro, M. (2009) Eettisen kuluttamisen monet merkitykset. Kulutustutkimus.Nyt 3(1) 1–16. http://www.kulutustutkimus.net/nyt/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/1pecoraro1-09.pdf
Peltokoski, J. (2003) Elämä politiikkana. Vegetarismi ja veganismi protestin tihentyminä Teoksessa Juppi, P., Peltokoski, J. & Pyykkönen, M. (toim.) Liike-elämää. Vastakulttuurinen radikalismi vuosituhannen vaihteessa 91–111. SoPhi 70. Jyväskylän yliopisto, Jyväskylä.
Peltola, T. & Heikkilä, J. (2016) Susi vai koira? Biopolitiikkaa Perhon susikäräjillä. TRACE: Journal for Human-Animal Studies 2. https://trace.journal.fi/article/view/56792
Pepper, A. (2021) Political Agency in Humans and Other Animals. Contemporary Political Theory 20(2) 296–317. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-020-00430-4
Piazza, J., Ruby, M. B., Loughnan, S., Luong, M., Kulik, J., Watkins, H. M. & Seigerman, M. (2015) Rationalizing Meat Consumption. The 4Ns. Appetite 91 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.011
Potts, A. (2016) What Is Meat Culture? Teoksessa Potts, A. (toim.) Meat Culture 1–30. Brill, Leiden. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004325852_002
Power, E. (2008) Furry Families: Making a Human–Dog Family through Home. Social & Cultural Geography 9(5) 535–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360802217790
Redmalm, D. (2021) Discipline and Puppies: The Powers of Pet Keeping. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 41(3/4) 440–454. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-08-2019-0162
Roos, J. P. (1998) Mitä on elämänpolitiikka? Teoksessa Roos, J. P. & Hoikkala, T. (toim.) Elämänpolitiikka 20–33. Gaudeamus, Helsinki.
Roos, J. P. & Hoikkala, T. (toim.) (1998) Elämänpolitiikka. Gaudeamus, Helsinki.
Rothgerber, H. (2013) A Meaty Matter. Pet Diet and the Vegetarian’s Dilemma. Appetite 68 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2013.04.012
Rothgerber, H. (2014) Carnivorous Cats, Vegetarian Dogs, and the Resolution of the Vegetarian’s Dilemma. Anthrozoös 27(4) 485–498. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279314X14072268687844
Ruiz-Junco, N. (2011) “Losing Neutrality in Your Everyday Life”: Framing Experience and Activist Identity Construction in the Spanish Environmental Movement. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 40(6) 713–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241611420842
Rönkä, M. (2020) Mia Röngän kolumni: Mikä on hiilitassunjälkesi? Yle kolumni. 26.7.2020 <https://yle.fi/a/3-11417512>. 20.12.2022.
Saaristo, K. (2000) Avoin asiantuntijuus: ympäristökysymys ja monimuotoinen ekspertiisi. Jyväskylän yliopisto, Jyväskylä.
Scott, M. & Lyman, S. (1968) Accounts. American Sociological Review 33(1) 46–62. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092239
Sherratt, A. (2007) Vegetarians and Their Children. Journal of Applied Philosophy 24(4) 425–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00389.x
Suoninen, E. (2016b) Näkökulma sosiaalisen todellisuuden rakentumiseen. Teoksessa Jokinen, A., Juhila, K. & Suoninen, E. (toim.) Diskurssianalyysi. Teoriat, peruskäsitteet ja käyttö 186–200. Vastapaino, Tampere.
Swanson, K. S., Carter, R. A., Yount, T. P., Aretz, J. & Buff, P. R. (2013) Nutritional Sustainability of Pet Foods. Advances in Nutrition 4(2) 141–150. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.112.003335
Tervonen, A. (2022) Tuotteena ihmisen paras ystävä – rotukoiratuotannon ihmiskeskeisyys. Teoksessa Kaarlenkaski, T., Latva, O. (toim.) Tunteva tuote: Kuinka eläimistä tuli osa teollista tuotantoa? 110–126. Vastapaino, Tampere.
Topál, J. & Gácsi, M. (2012) Lessons We Should Learn from Our Unique Relationship with Dogs: An Ethological Approach. Teoksessa Birke, L. & Hockenhull, J. (toim.) Crossing Boundaries: Investigating Human-animal Relationships 163–186. Brill, Leiden.
Turina, I. (2018) Pride and Burden: The Quest for Consistency in the Anti-Speciesist Movement. Society & Animals 26(3) 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685306-12341508
Véron, O. (2016) (Extra)Ordinary Activism: Veganism and the Shaping of Hemeratopias. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 36(11/12) 756–773. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-12-2015-0137
Vinnari, E. & Laine, M. (2017) The Moral Mechanism of Counter Accounts: The Case of Industrial Animal Production. Accounting, Organizations and Society 57 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2017.01.002.
Yle (2016) Ruokavalio voi viedä koiran huonoon kuntoon – vegaani ei aina syötä lemmikilleen lihaa. 6.6.2016. <https://yle.fi/a/3-8928232>. 22.1.2023.
Yle (2023) Gluteenittomuudesta tuli trendi ja se näkyy koirienkin ruokakupeissa – silti yksi koiranruokailmiö on yli muiden. 30.5.2023. <https://yle.fi/a/74-20034210>. 1.8.2023.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2024-06-12 (2)
- 2024-03-27 (1)
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ville Malila
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
When sending a manuscript the author(s) accept the digital publishing contract sähköisen kustannussopimuksen (please open the link and read it!). The publishing contract covers the publication of the manuscript on the paper and digital versions of the Alue ja ympäristö journal according to the Open Access principles and the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/]. The conditions allow anyone to copy and distribute the work for free in any medium and form, changed or unchanged provided that appropriate credit to author(s) is given, a link provided to the license, and any changes are indicated. Information on copyright issues in Finland are given by Kopiosto.
Alue ja ympäristö is a scientific journal that doesn't pursue economical gain. Instead the purpose of the publishing contract is to acknowledge the moral rights of the author(s) to their work and make possible the distribution of results of scientific research in Alue ja ympäristö journal in print as well as in digital form.
The licence concerning the metadata of published articles is Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0).
More information about open science in Finland:
